Ed O'Reilly Former Candidate for U.S. Senate

Governor Patrick Should Appoint next U.S. Senator with Conditions--Let's have our cake and eat it, too!

2008-11-08T02:21:00.000-08:00

During the recent campaign for U.S. Senate, I called upon Senator John Kerry to make a commitment to serve out his term, if he was re-elected. I was well aware that Senator Kerry had his eye, first and foremost, upon the position of Secretary of State in a potential President Obama Administration. I further called upon Senator Kerry to put up the millions of dollars it would take to hold a special election to fill his seat if his ambition came to fruition. Well, here we are. Senator Kerry is lobbying for Secretary of State and there is a good chance he may end up leaving the Senate job he was just elected to perform for the next 6 years and Massachusetts taxpayers will be left holding an empty bag.

At a time when firefighters and teachers are being laid off and, those teachers who are employed are dipping into their own pockets to pay for students’ essential supplies, Massachusetts taxpayers should not be burdened with the multi-million dollar cost of a special election for the U.S. Senate.

On the other hand, Governor Patrick should not be given full reign to appoint the next U.S. Senator, which could logically be seen as a lifetime appointment. This is a Democracy and Governor Patrick was elected to keep government open to the people.

In 1960, when Senator John F. Kennedy left his position as Massachusetts U.S. States Senator to become President of the United States, long time Kennedy friend and confidant, Benjamin Smith, was tapped to fill out the remainder of Senator Kennedy’s term. As a trusted and loyal friend, there was a tacit understanding that Senator Smith would not run for election when the Senate term expired in 1962. Keeping his word, Senator Smith did not run for election in 1962 and Edward M. Kennedy was elected by the people of Massachusetts to serve as the next U.S. Senator from Massachusetts. There is little doubt, in 1962, the people of Massachusetts made a great a choice.

However, as we have witnessed during the last campaign cycle, loyalty that existed in the early 1960's is a rare commodity these days in politics.

I am proposing that the Massachusetts Legislature pass a bill that gives Governor Patrick the power to appoint a U.S. Senator, if Senator Kerry gets his wish. Written into the legislation would be the condition that the person getting this appointment would only serve until the next statewide election--approximately two years from now. He or she would not be eligible to run at that time for the U.S. Senate and would be prohibited from promoting another candidate.

My proposal would save Massachusetts taxpayers millions of dollars and allow the money that would be spent for a special election to be invested in our local communities for education and public safety. In addition, it would allow Governor Patrick to appoint someone who could not only work with the new Administration, but also shake up the Senate a bit. After all, it was the U.S. Senate that grabbed the bailout ball from the House and gave it to the richest people in America and submissively asked these same people to allow some of the taxpayer money to trickle down to the people who need it the most. At this special time in history, we need someone in the U.S. Senate who will speak boldly for "ordinary" working people, fight special interests and not worry about being re-elected. Under this proposal, we could realize this rare opportunity.

The result of this legislation would be the culling out of those politicians who have a propensity to only run while being paid taxpayer dollars to work in another elected position. We need bold change in this country and encouraging personally and professionally conservative, self serving, calculating, and professional politicians to participate in a safe special election is not going to attract the kind of person we need to be our next U.S. Senator.

In order to talk about bold change in health care and economic justice, I, for one, believe a risk taker is the right kind of person for the job. For now, let's save Massachusetts taxpayers money and in two years, let's see who has the political courage and willingness to run.

The bottom line is that the people of Massachusetts can have their cake and eat it, too. My proposal is just simply the right thing to do.

Respectfully,

Ed O'Reilly
Former Democratic Candidate for U.S. Senate

Thank You

2008-09-18T10:09:00.001-07:00

Dear Supporters,

Below is what Ed has written to you, thanking you for your support and encouragement in his Primary battle with John Kerry.

I would also personally like to take this time to thank each and every one of you for reading my entries about my travels with Ed along the campaign trail. I learned so much, met so many wonderful people, and had the time of my life. Ed is the most genuine, thoughtful, and personable candidate I have ever met. I am honored to have worked with him, and for having worked with such a wonderful campaign staff.

Once again, thank you for believing in and fighting for what was right, and for what really mattered the most.

Best Wishes,

Greg Agnew

greg@edoreilly.com

The Things That Matter

I want to thank you for working with me on this campaign for meaningful change. What a journey it has been!

Although we came up short on the final numbers, we stuck to our principles and, above all else, we always kept it real.

People have asked what the future holds and, of course, I have little idea. Today, I am going to count my blessings and my heartfelt thanks to you is first on my list. I took this picture outside of my home a while back and, as the moon was setting, the sun was coming up behind me. I was sending this photo along as a symbol of where I feel I am at right now.

The truth however, is just a little different. The fog has rolled in here along the coast this morning and the fog horn is giving its familiar two blasts every thirty seconds. I know the moon is setting just outside of the fog and the sun is rising. For this moment, I can smell the sea, hear the fog horn, and be grateful for so much.

Gee, it’s nice to be home! Now, if I can only learn how to sleep past 4:30 am.
I truly appreciate your support and thank you, again!

All the best,
Ed

Ed O'Reilly: The New Marlboro Man, No Smoke, No Mirrors

2008-09-01T20:07:00.000-07:00

Dear Supporters,

Today, I had the privilege of being a part of one of the largest Labor Day Parades in the state in Marlboro, MA.

What a great day for a parade, the weather could not have been any better...and I have the sunburn to prove it!

If you were on the sidewalks, or viewing the parade from your back yard or porch, you probably shook hands with the future U.S. Senator from Massachusetts. Ed spent so much time talking with supporters that it almost seemed as if the whole parade route was a rally for Ed O'Reilly!

With only a few weeks left until the September 16, 2008 primary, Ed will be looking forward to your support. By visiting Ed's website, you can learn more about how you can help Ed during the final weeks of his campaign. While you're there, Ed also hopes that you'll be able to contribute to his efforts to unseat John Kerry and replace him with a working class candidate who will "think outside the beltway of Washington."

Sincerely,

Greg Agnew
greg@edoreilly.com

On the Road with Ed

2008-08-27T17:05:00.000-07:00

Dear Voters,

On August 25th, Ed, Bill, and myself all arrived at the Fall River Senior Apartments on Whipple Street in Fall River. We brought over 70 cups of coffee, and plenty of doughnuts for each and every person to enjoy, and believe me, they were thoroughly enjoyed!

After the coffee and doughnuts were served, Ed got right down to business. He began speaking about the problems facing our Commonwealth, pointing out how he will "repeal the GPO (Government Pension Offset) and the WEP (Windfall Elimination Provision)." Ed feels that "retired public employees should not be treated as second-class citizens. They deserve to be treated the same as private pension holders. Ed will fight in the U.S. Senate to ensure that the GPO and WEP are repealed."

Amongst many other issues facing our seniors, we heard many a compelling story from almost every person who attended this forum. One woman, in particular, stood out from the crowd. She is a cancer survivor, but still needs many medications and other heath care provisions to continue to live comfortably. She can't afford all of her medications and her heath care plan will not pay for the sleeve she needs to dull the constant pain in her arm. Each night, because she can't afford another sleeve, she must wash the sleeve, and wear it wet each morning. What does this situation say about the treatment our seniors receive from the heath care industry? Heath care should be a constitutional right.

As we were preparing to leave, it was clear the whole room was in support of Ed's candidacy, and Ed was happy to talk with each and every senior and find out how he could help them once he became our U.S. Senator.

More to come from the campaign trail!

Best Wishes,
Greg Agnew
greg@edoreilly.com

On the Road with Ed

2008-08-24T19:26:00.000-07:00

Dear Supporters and Voters,

Today, I had the pleasure of being with Ed and several of Ed's staff at the First Annual Billerica Family Outing and Meet the Candidates Event, co-sponsored by the Billerica Firefighters Union #1495, IBEW Local #103, and the Pipefitters Union #537.

Since Ed was a firefighter in three towns, he fit in pretty well at this event. Almost every firefighter spoke to Ed as if they were his brother, sharing stories of fond memories in the firehouses, or speaking with Ed about the need for AED's in every town.

There was certainly plenty of good food at this event, which went well with the plethora of Ed O'Reilly supporters who lined up to meet the next U.S. Senator from Massachusetts. Ed's supporters were eager to talk about the issues facing the voters of the Commonwealth, such as Gay Marriage, Abortion, and Immigration. Ed was glad to speak with each and every voter at this wonderful gathering, weather they intended to vote for him or not. Ed certainly answered every question on the minds of each voter, and believe me, there were a lot.

Before we knew it, it was off to Salem, and then back to Gloucester so Ed could rest for his next busy day of campaigning and meeting more of the working class!

Best Wishes,
Greg Agnew
greg@edoreilly.com

See you in September

2008-08-16T19:06:00.000-07:00

Dear Supporters and Voters,

Today was a very exciting day for me and the Ed O'Reilly for US Senate team as we held signs in support of Ed's candidacy near Kenmore Square! Our theme of our sign holding experience was undoubtedly, "See you in September."

We held our signs high as thousands of people walked by, and more often than not, each of us heard, "He's got my vote on September 16th." I was delighted to hear people commenting about the primary on September 16th, since there is expected to be a lower than normal voter turnout.

After passing out information about Ed and helping more people understand John Kerry's opponent, I was happy to yield back and watch the Red Sox game.

If you're interested in helping your community with a visibility effort, please call our campaign headquarters at: 866-716-2008 or click here to get more involved.

As always, Ed's team is looking for your contribution. Even a $10 contribution will make it far and help us spread our message throughout the Commonwealth.

Best Wishes,
Greg Agnew
greg@edoreilly.com

On the Road with Ed

2008-08-14T11:25:00.000-07:00

Below is a post from one of our supporters who was traveling with Ed on August 13th, 2008 at the Powderhouse Square event in Somerville, MA. I hope you enjoy reading his post and reading about how people received Ed at the event!

Best Wishes,
Greg Agnew
greg@edoreilly.com

Dear Readers,

Yesterday I went with Ed to Somerville Mayor Joe Curtatone’s Annual Senior Picnic at the beautiful park at Powderhouse Square in West Somerville.

Ed spent more than three hours meeting the 800-plus seniors who came out for the afternoon’s entertainment. As well as the guests, Ed met with Mayor Curtatone and many of the city’s Aldermen and School Committee members as well as many of the city’s activists.
The atmosphere was carnival-like as the seniors enjoyed music from George Landers, the city’s most famous DJ, the great Somerville Sunsetter’s Group, and a massive raffle with hundreds of prizes! Ed, along with other local politicians, donated gift cards for local businesses in the area. Sponsors also provided a picnic lunch for all attendees.

The reaction was fantastic. Many of the seniors had heard Ed’s interview on the Dan Rea show the night before and more than one even recognized Ed from his voice alone! The people Ed met were very responsive to his candidacy and hundreds promised him their votes. They seemed thrilled that Ed spent the time to meet with them and hear their concerns; many noted that they never see John Kerry around. Even more said that Kerry was out-of-touch and that they would be voting for Change this year.

Somerville seniors are a very active bunch – they are among the best voters come Election Day and I believe that Ed will do very well with them on September 16th. Somerville is Ed O’Reilly’s kind of town – working families and decent ordinary people. I expect that he will do very well here on Primary Day.

There is a highly-contested State Representative race in the western part of Somerville, and turnout in that area in particular will be very high. Many of the people Ed met invited him to visit their senior homes before the election and the campaign will be setting that up in the next few weeks.

Cindy Hickey, the tireless head of the Somerville Council on Aging – who organized the event – told me afterwards that she had never seen a candidate stay as long as Ed did. That is what Ed O’Reilly is all about of course – grassroots campaigning.

Sincerely,
Feargal O’Toole
Chair Ward 1 Somerville Democratic City Committee

On the Road for Ed

2008-08-05T19:37:00.001-07:00

Today, I had the privilege to speak with some great people at the National Night Out event in Grafton, MA. This event was geared toward keeping crime off the streets, and raising awareness about drug use in Massachusetts.

As I mulled around the fields at the Grafton Municipal Building, I spoke with many people who were concerned with John Kerry's lack of responsiveness over the past two-plus decades that he has occupied the Jr. Senate seat. They were also unhappy that there had been no televised debates between Ed and John, and were wondering when the two Democratic Candidates who are vying for the Nomination on September 16th, 2008 would get together and discuss the issues that are the most important to the residents of the Commonwealth.

It was evident to me that the word was spreading fast about Ed's run for the U.S. Senate. About 4 months ago, when I started to help Ed and his team, I approached people asking, "Do you know about Ed O'Reilly?" But now when I say that same sentence, people in Grafton and across Massachusetts respond, "Of course I know Ed O'Reilly!" Needless to say, Ed's name and message is traveling fast.

This event was great, and I'd like to thank each person who came up to me and showed their support for Ed's candidacy. You can be sure the message will continue to be spread, and as always, I'd hope you'd consider contributing to Ed's run for Senate.

Best Wishes,

Greg Agnew

greg@edoreilly.com

On the Road with Ed!

2008-08-03T17:59:00.000-07:00

Hello Everyone!

My name is Greg Agnew and I'd like to introduce myself to you! I've been working with Ed and his campaign for quite some time now...about 4 months or so, and now I'll be periodically blogging to you after or during some of our events until election day on September 16th, 2008! So if you're wondering what went on at each event, make sure to subscribe to Ed's blog and read about being "On the Road with Ed!"

8/2/2008
Sunday
Raynham Town Hall

After coffee, muffins, and donuts were delivered by Ed and enjoyed by all, Ed and many of his supporters gathered in the brand new Town Hall in Raynham, MA to speak on the topics that are on most voters' minds: heathcare, tax breaks for the rich, and Ed's "Renew America" plan. Ed spoke to many familiar faces, but also gained the attention of some new faces who were interested in finding out more about a True Massachusetts Democrat. At this particular event, Ed took quite a bit of questions, staying true to his promise to be open to questions at every event he attends.

8/2/2008
Sunday
Medway, Millis, and Medfield Democrats Picnic

We were very happy to see many familiar faces that we saw at the very same event last year! There were many enthusiastic "Ed" supporters here and Ed was happy to talk with each one of them. Most families were enjoying the fantastic food, while others were talking about the future of Massachusetts Democrats and the steep economic problems that our Commonwealth is facing. Ed spent most of his time conversing with picnic-goers who were concerned with the educational system in Massachusetts, and then later walked over to the buffet to sample some of the delicious food.

As always, I'm looking for feedback, positve or negative after each of my posts. And, I'm always hoping you can spread the word to contribute to Ed's campaign, or perhaps contribute yourself! Ed's running on a smaller budget than John Kerry, but the word is spreading fast around the state. For more information on Ed O'Reilly and his race for the U.S. Senate, please visit www.edoreilly.com!

Best Wishes,

Greg Agnew

greg@edoreilly.com

Exxon Mobil Sets Another Quarterly Profit Record

2008-08-01T05:55:00.000-07:00

Often times on the campaign trail, I ask this question: "Where is the outrage when our trooops and their families are sacrificing so much and we average Amercicans are paying $4.00 per gallon for gasoline while the major oil companies are making record profits?"

In discussing the need to have a total realignment of our energy model, I have cited the record profits Exxon Mobil made in 2007. These were not only record profits for Exxon Mobil, but they were record profits ever for a corporation. It is obvious that Exxon Mobil and the major oil companies need to be thoroughly investigated. Of course, we must keep in mind that our country has been hijacked by the oil industry with the likes of the current administration. After all, there was a tanker called the Condoleezza Rice in the recent past.

Well, it has happened again! Exxon Mobil yesterday reported the best quarterly profit for a corporation, even beating its last record profit! companieshttp://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/business/01oil.html?_r=2&ref=business&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

It is time we institute my proposal to "Renew America" www.edoreilly.com and end our dependence upon the major oil companies. With locally controlled, not for profit, renewable energy companies, there is no reason we can not some day plug our electric vehicles into renewable energy sources. It can be done! It is time to stop the influence of special interests in Washington and end the "stagnant quo".

Ed

Ed O'Reilly Challenges John Kerry To Debates

2008-07-27T07:43:00.000-07:00

On July 23rd, I challenged John Kerry to a series of debates. I believe it is not too much to ask Senator Kerry to devote 5 days every 6 years to enter into dialogue with the people of Massachusetts.

What do you think? Should John Kerry accept my challenge? Please vote in the poll to the right.

Please read my letter below that was delivered to John Kerry's campaign on July 23rd.

"Dear Senator Kerry:

With the September 16th Primary less than eight weeks away, I believe it is time for us to schedule debates and other forums so that the voters of Massachusetts will have the ability to participate in democracy to its fullest extent. With this in mind, I am proposing that we have the following three styles of debates:

1. You and I participate in town meeting style gatherings in each of the Commonwealth's 14 Counties. This would be a way of taking direct questions from local people in an informal setting. If we devote two to three hours to each county forum, this would take approximately three working days;

2. You and I appear in a somewhat more formal setting at each of the 5 UMass campuses, Springfield Technical Community College, North Shore Community College, Berkshire Community College and Cape Cod Community College. These could be more structured than the county forums with questions from the print media as well as from the audience. This would take approximately 10-16 hours;

3. We have been formally invited to appear on Springfield's Jim Madigan's (WGBY) program, with Emily Rooney on WGBH in Boston, on WBZ-TV's Jon Keller, and on NECN with Jim Braude. I have indicated to each of these hosts that I am willing to appear with you, but your confirmation is needed. Naturally, we should be fair to other television (and radio) hosts and I am willing to increase the number of appearances, accordingly.

Since the Senate is not in session the entire month of August, there is no reason why we should not bring more direct democracy into this campaign by implementing the first two above proposals within the next few weeks.

Many of the hosts in the third proposal have indicated that television appearances would be most beneficial to voters between Labor Day and the September 16th Primary. I agree.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Edward J. O'Reilly"

Thank You!

2008-06-07T23:30:00.001-07:00

I want to thank each and every delegate who voted today for change. It is really late and I hope to write more in the next few days.

I also want to apologize for not keeping up with this blog. For the past month, we have been working on a new website design and hope to have the new look completed within the next couple days, as well.

I truly appreciate all of the support I have been given in this quest to bring about bold change in both substance and style in the U.S. Senate.

Thank you.

Ed

Stop BU's Biolab in the South End

2007-12-13T08:54:00.000-08:00

As I have stated publicly, I am an opponent of the proposed Biolab in the South End. Other than convenience to Academia and area Hospitals, it would be difficult to find a less suitable location for this project.

I have posted today on Blue Mass Group http://www.bluemassgroup.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=9689 my comments relative to the Supreme Judicial Court's opinion relative to the Environmental Impact such a project could have on the South End and the City of Boston area.

This decision by the SJC is a victory for common sense.

Although the case is being sent back for further review, the ruling by the Superior Court judge vacating the Environmental Impact Report effectively means the process review process must start over.

The encouraging result of this decision is that it should effectively put an end to this ill advised project.

If this development project were to continue and the merits again were put before the SJC, the developers will have to deal with the "risks posed by the potential release of a contagious disease from the Biolab, which could cause catastrophic harm". The court went on to say that other locations must be considered for the Biolab.

Additionally, the SJC stated, "Given that the nature of a Biosafety Level 4 facility is to conduct research on highly virulent and infectious pathogens, and given that the Biolab will be located in a densely populated urban area, the likelihood that the release of such a pathogen will cause damage to the environment is extraordinarily high. The fact that University Associates will take all necessary precautions to minimize the chances of a release at the Biolab does not diminish the potential for catastrophic environmental damage if such a release does occur."

Although the decision is cloaked in legal procedures and statutory details, the message from the SJC is loud and clear. This is the wrong project in the wrong place. I agree.

Ed O'Reilly
www.edoreilly.com
A Massachusetts Democrat for the U.S. Senate

International Law and Iran

2007-10-26T07:35:00.000-07:00

Iran is a sovereign country and any attack upon it would be a violation of International Law according to the Charter of the United Nations http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/

The Bush administration wants a dialogue to begin about attacking Iran. It has thrown out several reasons, none of which are justified under International Law, for an attack.

There should be no dialogue about violating International Law.

Ed O'Reilly
Democratic Candidate for the U.S. Senate from Massachusetts

Iran Warmongering, Military Commissions Act, Cowboys, Blackwater

2007-10-24T08:29:00.000-07:00

The decision today by Secretary of State Rice, to implement "rules" relative to private security agencies operating in Iraq, clearly rejects suggestions by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates that security contractors be placed under military control. U.S. military commanders and officers in Iraq have sharply criticized the contractors, and North Carolina-based Blackwater in particular, for behaving like "cowboys" and undermining U.S. objectives for bringing stability to Iraq according to today's Washington Post

I have a question: If Iraq had a Military Commissions Act as we do here in the United States, could people serving in Blackwater and other "security" companies be categorized as illegal alien enemy combatants? If so, it would follow that these American Citizens would then be subjected to a legal system that excludes the protections of the Geneva Convention, denies Habeas Corpus and the right to a civilian attorney, and could leave them imprisoned for years without a right to a speedy trial. In reality, as the law now stands in Iraq, murder by these contractors could arguably be above any law.

In terms of Iran, VP Cheney and President Bush seem to be proceeding with the rhetoric that will lead us into some type of military conflict with Iran. The propaganda is not meant to sway the European Community, as both Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney are stating, but to convince us, as Americans, that we must use military force against Iran. We must respond to this war mongering in order to stop the momentum at its earliest stages.

I firmly believe that this Administration is intent on military action against Iran, not to protect Iraqi civilians or our troops, but to protect the oil industry in the southern part of Iraq--prior to their leaving office.

As a U.S. Senator, my voice would be loud and clear on this issue. The beating of the drums of war must be silenced by rational dialogue and aggressive diplomacy.

Ed O'Reilly
Democratic Candidate for the U.S. Senate from Massachusetts

Washington Red and Blue is Green All Over

2007-10-18T07:40:00.001-07:00

As a Democratic Candidate for the U.S. Senate from Massachusetts running for the seat currently held by John Kerry, I was appalled by the Democrats' failure to address a tax loophole
Washington Post
for some of the wealthiest people in America. This tax loophole for billionaires has been called the size of a Mack truck by Huffington Post

It is a sad day in America when the only common ground that Republicans and Democrats have found is the bowing to powerful special interest lobbying. John Kerry skipped out of the Senate to start his vacation a day early on August 3rd and was AWOL on the important FISA vote which took a big chunk out of our Constitution. Again, it is the non vote that really defines the lack of leadership and absence of the courage of convictions. Should not the U.S. Senate have shortened their month long vacation while we are at War to take up a loophole that could pay for the health care of every low income child in America through the age of 12?

If you would like to stop the influence of special interests, please visit Act Blue

Ed O'Reilly
www.edoreilly.com

John Kerry's Calculation Paralysis

2007-09-22T05:46:00.000-07:00

The image of a detached John Kerry standing idly by while the Florida student was arrested and tasered last week illuminated the consistent picture of who John Kerry really is. While the very concept of democracy has been blasted away by a Republican agenda, John Kerry as a United States Senator, has consistently shown a lack of leadership and an inability to respond without calculating his own political image and/or his own political ambitions.

This obsession with political self interest was clearly demonstrated by Senator Kerry’s vote to authorize military action in Iraq and has continued through last month’s lack of participation and interest on the extremely important Foreign Intelligence and Surveillance Act vote. Even the delayed response to the Swift Boat Veterans attacks can be traced to calculation obsession. Although John Kerry may vote the right way on a particular issue, it is consistently the result of considering what is best for John Kerry.

In many ways, John Kerry epitomizes what is wrong in Washington. He is detached from ordinary people and excessively consumed with political self interest. Senator Kerry’s explanation the following day for his actions/inactions in Florida was convoluted and calculated. His reaction to the defeat of the marriage equality amendment was strikingly similar (I am a firm supporter of marriage equality and Senator Kerry is not).

Last June, John Kerry held a forum in Natick, Massachusetts and the result of that forum came close to the result in Florida. In Natick, it was apparent from the beginning that people were not happy with John Kerry for many reasons. Some of the concerns were John Kerry’s lack of standing with convictions during the 2004 Presidential election, the walking away from Ohio with $15m left of our money in his campaign fund (half of which he has taken and put into the 2008 Massachusetts Senate race) when there was a team of lawyers on the ground to contest the election, and for his vote to authorize military action in Iraq.

As people lined the two aisles waiting to speak in the Natick auditorium, the tone consistently contained disappointment and outrage. After several questions, it was clear that John Kerry was not comfortable answering any more questions and he went on one long diatribe after another in order to fill up the time and avoid having to answer any more questions.

Senator Kerry’s mini filibuster at the Natick forum resulted in extreme frustration and controlled chaos. As the comments grew more intense and the crowd more anxious, I carefully watched the Natick Police Sergeant standing in the back of the auditorium. As a criminal defense attorney for over 25 years, I was tuned in to how he was reacting. Although it was clear that his awareness was very heightened and that he was ready to move if a crime was committed, he stayed back and out of the way of the verbal volleys. This police sergeant demonstrated tremendous professionalism. Nonetheless, most people left the forum exasperated.

Since the Natick forum, John Kerry will only appear in Massachusetts when he is in control of the dialogue. I have been to approximately 35 Democratic events during the last several months where open dialogue was the norm. John Kerry has appeared at none of these occasions.

Senator Kerry, despite having a month off from the Senate, has declined many invitations by local Democratic Committees to appear with me to discuss the War in Iraq, Health Care, Education, Special Interests, the Environment and Renewable Energy.

The people of Massachusetts want Senator Kerry to debate these issues. Unfortunately, after careful calculation, Senator Kerry has come to the conclusion that although debate and dialogue may be in the best interest of the people of Massachusetts, it is not in John Kerry’s best political interest. Isn’t that what politics as usual is all about?

I invite you to visit my website to see where I stand on the issues and thank you in advance for doing so [Ed O'Reilly http://www.edoreilly.com]

If you would like to help end politics as usual please click on [Act Blue http://www.actblue.com/entity/fundraisers/18072]. Since John Kerry started with over $7m of our campaign contributions left from the Presidential Election of 2004, your help is extremely important and greatly appreciated.

Ed O'Reilly
www.edoreilly.com

Yearly Kos, John Kerry AWOL, and Our Constitution

2007-08-13T09:26:00.001-07:00

On May 20th, the day after I announced my candidacy for the U.S. Senate, from and for, Massachusetts, I was told that I had to take a serious look at "the blogs". Of course, not knowing anything about a blog, my first reaction was to ask, "Are you sure?" I had no idea what a blog was and I wondered why I had to even think about going to such a place.

Well, I have always loved adventure, so I agreed to take a look into the world of blogging. One of my first posts was on http://www.bluemassgroup.com/ entitled "My Candidacy for the U.S. Senate” http://www.bluemassgroup.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=7401

After a short time, I came to realize that blogging was a whole lot more than just a group of people reading and writing. In the area of politics, blogging contained an under the radar community of political activists. In July, I heard about a convention being held in Chicago and had a desire to learn more. I signed up and went to Chicago, not knowing exactly what to expect.

Last week, I attended the Yearly Kos Convention in Chicago and soon realized “Netroots” is a progressive movement intent on changing politics as usual and using the internet to effectuate non-violent change. The “netroots” bloggers of today are very similar to the generation, of which I belong, who protested on the streets in the 1960’s and 1970’s.

Howard Dean spoke at YKOS Convention and talked about how this new generation isn’t as confrontational as our generation was. I respectfully disagree with this statement in many respects. First, this new generation is not all about new. I met people like Dave Johnson http://www.blogger.com/profile/15379071611629790251 who was a political activist during “our” generation and who has taken the same passion and commitment to social justice into the world of blogging. I appeared on blog talk radio with Dave and James Boyce, another well known blogger. http://www.blogtalkradio.com/showlauncher.aspx?show_id=43448&link_type=stream_downloads&link=http://boss.streamos.com/wmedia/blogtalkradio/show_43448.wax

I also spent some time with Matt Stoller http://mattstoller.com/ , whose light aura, clear intelligence, and self assured and modest demeanor, left me no doubt that he has all of the makings of becoming a great leader for our country. Matt is showing the courage to work in areas outside the comfort zone that comes with being around people with similar political belief systems. He is working to develop common connections and alliances where others can not see or will not look. For instance, in the area of keeping the internet free from further regulation, Matt has teamed up with many groups outside the “liberal” framework. It is this fearless and unbiased searching for commonality of purpose that will someday unite us all again as Americans. Matt is leading via “Netroots”.

Although not an endorsement, Matt Stoller wrote about our time together in the Open Left Blog in an article entitled “A Good O’Reilly in Massachusetts”
http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=558

In many ways, “netroots” really is confrontational and does hold politicians accountable. In the 1960’s and 70’s large numbers of people just showing up for a demonstration was a statement. At YKOS more than 1,500 people showed up and these attendees represented tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of people who read and write in political blogs every day.

The disbursement of information is a powerful tool and the people who attended the YKOS Convention represent a growing political movement. Howard Dean talked about campaigns as dialogue and listening, not just for listening for the sake of getting elected, but in a way that actually integrates the ideas of constituents into the policies and positions of candidates.

On the other hand, the holding back of information is deceptive and undemocratic. Our leaders need to be held accountable. The results of “Netroots” has been the opening up of campaigns and candidates to questions outside of the traditional media and Washington beltway mentality. “Netroots” demands that Candidates and Politicians enter into real and meaningful dialogue.

Immediate and Specific Application of Honest and Open Dialogue

Upon my return from Chicago, I read that my opponent, Senator John Kerry, was AWOL relative to one of the most important votes of this Senate term--the FISA vote http://156.33.195.33/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00309

My first reaction was that, for a U.S. Senator to miss such an important vote, there had to have been a family crisis or a medical emergency. To my astonishment, Senator Kerry’s spokesperson said he left the Senate to go on a charity bike ride http://video1.washingtontimes.com/bellantoni/2007/08/kerry_misses_fisa_vote_would_h.html

As the facts have come out, this statement by a spokesperson may not have been the entire truth. The charity bike ride was the next day—August 4th! Senator Kerry was present in the U.S. Senate in the morning of August 3rd at 9:38 am when he voted to approve a U.S. District Court Judge http://156.33.195.33/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00308 .

However, there seems to be no record of Mr. Kerry being in the Senate after this morning vote was taken although 2 more votes were recorded on August 3rd http://156.33.195.33/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/vote_menu_110_1.htm

I recently sent Senator Kerry a letter http://edoreilly.com/?q=node/38 calling upon him to tell his employers, the people of Massachusetts, what time he left work on August 3rd, whether he entered into any of the debate on the FISA bill, and exactly where he was at 9:16 pm when the FISA vote was taken at his place of employment, the United States Senate.

Riding or Posing?

Until a response from John Kerry, himself, to the contrary, the truth may be that Senator Kerry was not really riding at the time of this vote, as stated by his spokesperson. Senator Kerry may actually have been posing at a gathering the night before the race. To think that a U.S. Senator could be AWOL for one of the most important votes of this session because of the lure of sound bites and photo ops is almost beyond belief.

Most Americans can not leave their jobs at their leisure. When I was a corrections officer, it would have been unthinkable for me to just leave my post in a guard tower to get my picture taken for even a well known, worthwhile and important charity event. When I was a firefighter, it would have been unconscionable for me not to respond to a medical emergency or a fire because I wanted to bask in the lights of cameras. Is not our Constitution of equal merit?

Senator Kerry’s spokesperson said he would have returned to Washington if needed. Does the U.S. Senate not debate and exert the power of persuasion over fellow Senators within the U.S. Senate Chamber? Isn’t the job of a United States Senator more than a perfunctory activity?

The FISA vote was an extremely close vote where one vote would have made a difference. If Senator Kerry is a leader, as he self proclaims, he had a duty to at least stay and try to persuade just one fellow Democrat to stand up for our Constitution. The bottom line is that by not voting, Senator Kerry subverted the very nature of the democratic process.

Furthermore, by being AWOL on the FISA legislation, Senator Kerry has given up all future credibility to lead any fight against this Imperialistic Presidency. Leaders lead by example.

In 2002, Senator Kerry, over the objections of Senator Robert Byrd and the insistence of Senator Kennedy, voted to give the Executive Branch unbridled power to wage war in Iraq which has left us in the present situation. Last week, Senator Kerry gave the Executive Branch unbridled power to electronically eavesdrop without a warrant on the citizens of the United States.

As with Iraq, Congress is going to have a difficult time undoing the damage done, as this op-ed in Saturday’s New York Times so succinctly states: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/11/opinion/11sat1.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

Senator Kerry has insisted that he is leading the fight in Washington. When it came to the FISA vote and standing up for our Constitutional Rights, there is no doubt Senator Kerry was leading the flight from Washington.

In the tradition of “netroots”, perhaps Senator Kerry could speak for himself rather than through a spokesperson on the FISA vote. How can the principles of “netroots” and open dialogue occur through spokespeople? The people of Massachusetts and this country want honest and open dialogue in order to insure the integrity of the democratic process. After all, when it comes to photo ops and sound bites, has Senator Kerry ever had difficulty standing front and center?

Ed O’Reilly
Democratic Candidate for the U.S. Senate from, and for, Massachusetts
http://www.edoreilly.com

2007-05-23T05:41:00.000-07:00

I am posting the following on bluemassgroup blog today:

As I reflect on Saturday's Convention, I want to thank the members of our party for the graciousness for which I was received. As a long time John Kerry supporter, who became disillusioned after his vote to support President Bush's unilateral military action in Iraq, I found many delegates sharing my feelings of disenchantment. I also found commonality with delegates who put their efforts behind Howard Dean's courageous stance against the Republican Propaganda Machine at that time. Ultimately, I shared every delegates support for Mr. Kerry as our Democratic Presidential Nominee.

My candidacy for the U.S. Senate is the result of many months of discussions with the people of Massachusetts. As a supporter of Mr. Kerry's for over twenty years, I felt that others must share in the disappointment, not only with Senator Kerry's vote on Iraq, but with his inability to stand with a clear message of convictions.
I also thought that others must share the dissatisfaction I felt from Mr. Kerry having $15m left in his campaign fund as we lost Ohio by the slimmest of margins. It was not only the loss in Ohio, but the decision not to contest the voting process, that disturbed me. Not surprisingly, the delegates with whom I spoke, shared in these same emotions.

My candidacy for the U.S. Senate is about change. It is about the courage of convictions. It is about the commitment to clear and concise Democratic principles. As a person from a working class background, I understand how it is to live week to week on a paycheck. I understand the value of public education. As a former union worker, I understand the power of standing together. I understand the concept of "We the People".

I also understand that my candidacy is not about me, but about us--about us, as a United Democratic Party in these United States. The time has come to carry the message that new leadership means a new partnership; a partnership between our U.S. Senator and the people of Massachusetts--a partnership that brings a renewed sense of purpose. It is a positive message of hope and change in our state, our country and the world.

Democratic Principles?

2007-05-21T04:24:00.000-07:00

John Kerry is having his opening "kickoff" this evening. Most Massachusetts Democrats do not know about this opening of his Senate Campaign because the minimum amount to attend is $1,000. If a constituent would like to belong to a smaller group and have an audience with our, "elected by the people U.S. Senator," the cost is $2,300.

I find this event, which should be the most inclusive of any campaign, to be an affront to the rank and file Democrats across the state.

I have written Mr. Kerry a letter (www.edoreilly.com) indicating that I will be declining this invitation.

More importantly, I have asked Senator Kerry, in this letter, to donate the $15m Democrats contributed to his Presidential Campaign Fund. This is/was not his money to spend on other campaigns or as he sees fit three years after the Presidential Campaign that he lost. He should have used the money to win in Ohio and, at least, contest the election.

I am particularly upset because Mr. Kerry paid himself back $6.4m from the fund, but didn't return anyone else's money.

I have called upon Mr. Kerry to donate all of this money to charitable Veterans' Groups. Please read the entire letter I sent to Senator Kerry at www.edoreilly.com .

I do not believe Mr. Kerry's vote to support the war in Iraq was a mistake because everything John Kerry does is very calculated. I'll comment on that later. If, on the other hand, we are to believe it was a mistake, he should pay Veterans and their families for that mistake. Quoting Mr. Kerry's own words to support the troops "not just in words, but in actions".